Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#39638 - Include BFQ patchset
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Alexander Mezin (Sanya_M) - Wednesday, 26 March 2014, 19:50 GMT
Last edited by Thomas Bächler (brain0) - Wednesday, 26 March 2014, 20:02 GMT
Opened by Alexander Mezin (Sanya_M) - Wednesday, 26 March 2014, 19:50 GMT
Last edited by Thomas Bächler (brain0) - Wednesday, 26 March 2014, 20:02 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
On my laptop with rotational hard drive, system boots almost twice faster with BFQ scheduler than with CFQ or deadline schedulers. BFQ is the only thing that forces me to build kernel from source. I heard that there are plans to include BFQ in mainline kernel for 3.15. Also, if BFQ won't be the default scheduler, it shouldn't break anything. But enabling it will become much easier - kernel command line option versus building the kernel from source. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Thomas Bächler (brain0)
Wednesday, 26 March 2014, 20:02 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Wednesday, 26 March 2014, 20:02 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Comment by John (graysky) -
Wednesday, 26 March 2014, 19:57 GMT
I have been packaging linux-ck with BFQ for ages now with no ill effects. Yes, it does not need to be enabled and can reside as an option like noop or deadline. I believe you are correct in that Paolo has submitted BFQ officially to upstream; I had a link but cannot find it ATM.