Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#39442 - [libc++abi] build fails

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by Joel Teichroeb (klusark) - Saturday, 15 March 2014, 04:23 GMT
Last edited by Daniel Micay (thestinger) - Saturday, 06 September 2014, 01:17 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Upstream Bugs
Status Closed
Assigned To Daniel Micay (thestinger)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:


+ clang++ -c -g -O3 -fPIC -std=c++0x -stdlib=libc++ -fstrict-aliasing -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -Wsign-conversion -Wshadow -Wconversion -Wunused-variable -Wmissing-field-initializers -Wchar-subscripts -Wmismatched-tags -Wmissing-braces -Wshorten-64-to-32 -Wsign-compare -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -Wstrict-overflow=4 -Wunused-parameter -Wnewline-eof -I../include ../src/stdexcept.cpp
../src/stdexcept.cpp:69:44: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
__libcpp_nmstr(const __libcpp_nmstr& s) _LIBCPP_CANTTHROW;
^
;
../src/stdexcept.cpp:70:55: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
__libcpp_nmstr& operator=(const __libcpp_nmstr& s) _LIBCPP_CANTTHROW;
^
;
../src/stdexcept.cpp:71:22: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
~__libcpp_nmstr() _LIBCPP_CANTTHROW;
^
;
3 errors generated.
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...


Steps to reproduce:
sudo extra-x86_64-build
This task depends upon

Closed by  Daniel Micay (thestinger)
Saturday, 06 September 2014, 01:17 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  libc++abi-3.5.0-1
Comment by Daniel Micay (thestinger) - Monday, 28 April 2014, 08:50 GMT
It doesn't seem that there's any sane way to deal with this beyond convincing upstream to do a release or switching to following trunk. There hasn't been a release as part of the LLVM project since 3.2... perhaps libc++ feels like working with libsupc++ again, but our bleeding edge gcc upgrades were problematic before.

Loading...