Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#38692 - TLP and pm-utils are now conflicts
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Ryan Owens (ryanvade) - Monday, 27 January 2014, 21:07 GMT
Last edited by Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd) - Tuesday, 28 January 2014, 08:29 GMT
Opened by Ryan Owens (ryanvade) - Monday, 27 January 2014, 21:07 GMT
Last edited by Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd) - Tuesday, 28 January 2014, 08:29 GMT
|
DetailsDescription: For some reason TLP and pm-utils are now conflicts when they should not be.
Additional info: * package version(s) * config and/or log files etc. TLP 0.4.1-1 pm-utils 1.4.1-6 Steps to reproduce: attempt to install TLP and PM-UTILS on the same system. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd)
Tuesday, 28 January 2014, 08:29 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Tuesday, 28 January 2014, 08:29 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug

No, tlp and pm-utils do conflict. This was worked around before in the AUR .install file by replacing some pm-utils files with symlinks to files from tlp. I will not have that in an official package. pm-utils has become obsolete for some time now that we use systemd anyway.