Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#38656 - [ruby-atk] Wrong package version?
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Methos (Methos) - Saturday, 25 January 2014, 10:36 GMT
Last edited by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto) - Tuesday, 28 January 2014, 14:30 GMT
Opened by Methos (Methos) - Saturday, 25 January 2014, 10:36 GMT
Last edited by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto) - Tuesday, 28 January 2014, 14:30 GMT
|
DetailsWhile trying to update I got the error that my locale ruby-atk (ruby-gdkpxbuf2, ruby-glb2,ruby-gtk2, ruby-pango also) is newer than that in the community repo.
I think that with the last update the version naming went wrong. I think it shouldn't be ruby-atk 2.0.0-3 but 2.0.3-1. The questionable commit was https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/ruby-gtk2&id=8a550c2de5b36e2ea6acca5f49da95dfded7cb80 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto)
Tuesday, 28 January 2014, 14:30 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Tuesday, 28 January 2014, 14:30 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
:: Starting full system upgrade...
warning: ruby-atk: local (2.0.2-1) is newer than community (2.0.0-3)
warning: ruby-gdkpixbuf2: local (2.0.2-1) is newer than community (2.0.0-3)
warning: ruby-glib2: local (2.0.2-1) is newer than community (2.0.0-3)
warning: ruby-gtk2: local (2.0.2-1) is newer than community (2.0.0-3)
warning: ruby-pango: local (2.0.2-1) is newer than community (2.0.0-3)
There is a new version waiting in [community-testing]. Once it is moved (not by me), this problem is resolved.
In the mean time, I will consider looking into removing the warnings as well.
I will let maintainer close this bug.