Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#38432 - [totem] requires python2-xdg for opensubtitles plugin
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Janne Haapsaari (haaja) - Thursday, 09 January 2014, 10:10 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Monday, 28 April 2014, 07:32 GMT
Opened by Janne Haapsaari (haaja) - Thursday, 09 January 2014, 10:10 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Monday, 28 April 2014, 07:32 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
The totem package should depend on python2-xdg as the opensubtitles plugin has not, as of version 3.10.1, been ported to python3. In my tests this is the only totem python plugin that refuses to load. This problem will be resolved when the next version of totem is released as the opensubtitles plugin has been ported to python3 in git master. Additional info: * package version(s): Name: totem, Version: 3.10.1-1 Name: python2-xdg, version: 0.25-1 Steps to reproduce: 1. Install totem 2. Run totem 3. Enable Subtitle Downloader plugin (Edit -> Plugins... and check Subtitle Downloader plugin) You will get a traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/totem/plugins/opensubtitles/opensubtitles.py", line 8, in <module> import xdg.BaseDirectory ImportError: No module named xdg.BaseDirectory Steps to fix: 1. Install python2-xdg and the plugin will load correctly. |
This task depends upon
Comment by Jan de Groot (JGC) -
Friday, 10 January 2014, 09:50 GMT
Backporting https://git.gnome.org/browse/totem/commit?id=6022536e085e65c086282c831f27000b13f3abfe should also fix this.
Comment by Janne Haapsaari (haaja) -
Friday, 10 January 2014, 10:25 GMT
You're right, that's a more elegant solution.