Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#38138 - [octave] Missing dependency on glu
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Raphael Scholer (rscholer) - Saturday, 14 December 2013, 21:31 GMT
Last edited by Ronald van Haren (pressh) - Monday, 23 December 2013, 19:45 GMT
Opened by Raphael Scholer (rscholer) - Saturday, 14 December 2013, 21:31 GMT
Last edited by Ronald van Haren (pressh) - Monday, 23 December 2013, 19:45 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
octave won't start without installed glu. Error message when running `LC_ALL=C octave`: "octave: error while loading shared libraries: libGLU.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory" Additional info: * package version(s): 3.6.4-4 Steps to reproduce: - Uninstall glu - Start octave |
This task depends upon
Closed by Ronald van Haren (pressh)
Monday, 23 December 2013, 19:45 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: 3.6.4-4
Monday, 23 December 2013, 19:45 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: 3.6.4-4
Comment by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto) -
Tuesday, 17 December 2013, 09:41 GMT
Also assigned to last packager, hope that's okay with you, Bartłomiej.
Comment by Ronald van Haren (pressh) -
Tuesday, 17 December 2013, 09:46 GMT
Did you use a clean chroot to build Bartłomiej?
Comment by Bartłomiej Piotrowski (Barthalion) -
Wednesday, 18 December 2013, 20:25 GMT
No, I've used our build wrappers as always. I'll push fixed package tommorow.
Comment by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto) -
Thursday, 19 December 2013, 10:47 GMT
If Bartłomiej is the de facto maintainer of octave, perhaps the Maintainer field of the package should be changed to reflect this (by Ronald disowning it and Bartłomiej adopting it).
Comment by Ronald van Haren (pressh) -
Thursday, 19 December 2013, 10:52 GMT
He is not, he did a rebuild and apparently he broke it doing so (though it may have been broken before without anybody noticing, that's why I asked if he did build it in a clean chroot). Anyway, I can fix it tonight if it is not already fixed at that time.