Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#38086 - [gcc] Leaves zombie files/dirs on upgrade
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Monday, 09 December 2013, 22:34 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Friday, 16 May 2014, 11:04 GMT
Opened by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Monday, 09 December 2013, 22:34 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Friday, 16 May 2014, 11:04 GMT
|
DetailsIn /usr/share/gcc-4.8.?/python/libstdcxx, there are three python scripts that apparently get run as root at some point. When this happens, they create bytecode compiled .pyc files, which, of course, are not tracked by pacman. On each upgrade of gcc, the .pyc files and the dirs get left behind because the path is specific to each version. I had /usr/share/gcc-4.8.0/ and /usr/share/gcc-4.8.1/ on my system in addition to the current /usr/share/gcc-4.8.2/.
|
This task depends upon
Closed by Allan McRae (Allan)
Friday, 16 May 2014, 11:04 GMT
Reason for closing: Deferred
Additional comments about closing: Waiting on Arch to formalize a policy for .pyc/.pyo files being contained in a package
Friday, 16 May 2014, 11:04 GMT
Reason for closing: Deferred
Additional comments about closing: Waiting on Arch to formalize a policy for .pyc/.pyo files being contained in a package
I have little intention of doing anything about this until Arch formalizes its policy on how to handle .pyc/.pyo files. I have tried several times to get that done.