Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#38055 - glibc-debug needed (special case of debugging packages)
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Shawn Landden (scientes) - Sunday, 08 December 2013, 00:27 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Thursday, 19 December 2013, 13:06 GMT
Opened by Shawn Landden (scientes) - Sunday, 08 December 2013, 00:27 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Thursday, 19 December 2013, 13:06 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
I understand the want to not have debug symbols clog the archives, but glibc-debug is a _very_ special case, without it you can't even view the value of "errno" in gdb, instead you have to switch between strace and gdb to get errno values, which is very painful. ALL packages link against glibc, and use its functions, having debug for libc6 is absolutely essential. I am not asking for debug packages to litter the archives, I am asking for just this one essential debug package to be added to the archives. |
This task depends upon
/usr/lib/libc.so.6: symbolic link to `libc-2.18.so'
> file /usr/lib/libc-2.18.so
/usr/lib/libc-2.18.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (GNU/Linux), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), BuildID[sha1]=955e1f73103beb01da546030a56ef1c700d30cdd, for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, not stripped
So.... "not stripped".
Which library do you want debugging symbols for?