Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#36981 - [opencv] requires ffmpeg rebuild
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Arjun Comar (acomar) - Thursday, 19 September 2013, 04:23 GMT
Last edited by Ray Rashif (schivmeister) - Thursday, 10 October 2013, 11:01 GMT
Opened by Arjun Comar (acomar) - Thursday, 19 September 2013, 04:23 GMT
Last edited by Ray Rashif (schivmeister) - Thursday, 10 October 2013, 11:01 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
opencv provides the module highgui (libhighgui.so) that requires libavcodec.so and libavformat.so. Because this dependency is untracked, the current version of opencv (2.4.6.1-2) is broken, requiring libavcodec.so.54 libavformat.so.54 when the current version of ffmpeg (1:2.0.1-1) provides libavcodec.so.55 and libavformat.so.55. opencv 2.4.6.1-1 ffmpeg 1:2.0.1-1 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Ray Rashif (schivmeister)
Thursday, 10 October 2013, 11:01 GMT
Reason for closing: No response
Additional comments about closing: Assuming fixed, moved from testing.
Thursday, 10 October 2013, 11:01 GMT
Reason for closing: No response
Additional comments about closing: Assuming fixed, moved from testing.
Comment by Ray Rashif (schivmeister) -
Sunday, 22 September 2013, 09:48 GMT
- Field changed: Summary ([opencv] requires ffmpeg → [opencv] requires ffmpeg rebuild)
- Field changed: Severity (Low → Medium)
Yes, it needs a rebuild. Thanks for the report.
Comment by Ray Rashif (schivmeister) -
Wednesday, 25 September 2013, 20:17 GMT
I had rebuilt it previously for the ffmpeg rebuild list, but apparently it didn't work. So please test -3 in [testing].
Comment by Arjun Comar (acomar) -
Wednesday, 25 September 2013, 21:29 GMT
I'm afraid I don't see -3 in [testing] yet, just -2 in [extra]. Would you like the code I found the bug with?
Comment by Ray Rashif (schivmeister) -
Thursday, 26 September 2013, 07:43 GMT
Your mirror may be delayed, and it normally takes a while to propagate. Anyway, yes, a reproduction would be good.