Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Reporting_Bug_Guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#36752 - {wiki} Wiki headline numbering missing for better readability

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by t-ask (tAsk) - Saturday, 31 August 2013, 14:21 GMT
Last edited by Pierre Schmitz (Pierre) - Saturday, 02 November 2013, 20:49 GMT
Task Type Feature Request
Category Web Sites
Status Closed
Assigned To Pierre Schmitz (Pierre)
Architecture All
Severity Medium
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 1
Private No

Details

Description:
If you are reading long Arch Wiki pages like the 'Beginners guide' with several subsections only the table of content shows headline numbering. Yet the headline numbering is missing within the text. This can easily lead to wrong reading the text. Then the reader doesn't get the subsection/hierarchy of the text's content. Just switching the font-size isn't enough to improve readability. We can improve this a lot by also adding subsection numbering here.

Lets improve the readability of our Wiki. Maybe use another font family for captions and subsections. Here an example where I changed the font-weight, font-size, color and line-height by using the Ubuntu font-family:

http://i1.minus.com/ibclg3qULaUs69.png

An article on developing good web typography: http://retinart.net/typography/typographicscale/

Other Examples:
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/font-size-and-zoom-increase-size-of-web-pages
http://3.7designs.co/blog/2008/06/10-examples-of-beautiful-css-typography-and-how-they-did-it/
http://www.seedconference.com/seed.php
This task depends upon

Closed by  Pierre Schmitz (Pierre)
Saturday, 02 November 2013, 20:49 GMT
Reason for closing:  Upstream
Comment by Pierre Schmitz (Pierre) - Saturday, 02 November 2013, 20:49 GMT
We use mostly the vanilla MonoBook design by MediaWiki. I'd suggest to push more in-depth changes like this upstream then.

Loading...