Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#36541 - [wireshark-cli] Users should be informed about what 'wireshark' group membership actually confers
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Anonymous (reallybmn) - Thursday, 15 August 2013, 14:07 GMT
Last edited by Balló György (City-busz) - Tuesday, 21 January 2014, 00:22 GMT
Opened by Anonymous (reallybmn) - Thursday, 15 August 2013, 14:07 GMT
Last edited by Balló György (City-busz) - Tuesday, 21 January 2014, 00:22 GMT
|
DetailsUsers are currently advised to bestow 'wireshark' group membership on any user that is supposed to be able to use wireshark for live captures. The other side of that coin, extraneous privileges, is never explored. It should be explained what this group membership really means. AFAICT, it enables the user to use /usr/bin/dumpcap with CAP_NET_ADMIN and CAP_NET_RAW=eip privileges and no more, but I am unsure and so would probably be most prospective users of this package.
Stating the actual extent of the extra privileges can be done in a doc file or during package installs and upgrades. The package version current right now is 1.10.1-1. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Balló György (City-busz)
Tuesday, 21 January 2014, 00:22 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Tuesday, 21 January 2014, 00:22 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Wireshark#Capturing_as_normal_user