Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#36508 - [iputils] Doesn't provide BSD license in package

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Simon Hollingshead (elpasi) - Monday, 12 August 2013, 19:06 GMT
Last edited by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) - Tuesday, 13 August 2013, 15:08 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Core
Status Closed
Assigned To Tobias Powalowski (tpowa)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

iputils reports its licensing arrangement as "BSD, GPL". GPL is covered by the common licenses. BSD, however, is not.

((The MIT, BSD, zlib/libpng and Python licenses are special cases and cannot be included in the 'common' licenses pkg. For the sake of the license variable, it is treated like a common license (license=('BSD'), license=('MIT'), license=('ZLIB') or license=('Python')) but for the sake of the filesystem, it is a custom license, because each one has its own copyright line. Each MIT, BSD, zlib/libpng or Python licensed package should have its unique license stored in /usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/.))

There is no /usr/share/licenses/iputils/ folder created in which information about the BSD-licensed part of the package is placed.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Tobias Powalowski (tpowa)
Tuesday, 13 August 2013, 15:08 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  20121221-3
Comment by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) - Tuesday, 13 August 2013, 06:25 GMT
I think we can remove the BSD license, we don't provide ninfod which has a special COPYING.
Looking at the iputils.spec provided in source only GPL is mentioned as license.
Do you agree with me?
Comment by Simon Hollingshead (elpasi) - Tuesday, 13 August 2013, 14:12 GMT
After a quick glance over the source, that seems a fair conclusion.

Loading...