FS#35868 - [openssl] 1.0.1e-3 fails to build with perl-5.18.0
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Garry Roseman (sitquietly) - Thursday, 20 June 2013, 21:13 GMT
Last edited by Pierre Schmitz (Pierre) - Saturday, 02 November 2013, 21:06 GMT
Opened by Garry Roseman (sitquietly) - Thursday, 20 June 2013, 21:13 GMT
Last edited by Pierre Schmitz (Pierre) - Saturday, 02 November 2013, 21:06 GMT
|
Details
Description: the build fails in pod2man while trying to
generate man pages from the pod files.
Additional Info: * config and/or log files etc. At the end of the build log file we have: [code] installing man1/CA.pl.1ssl installing man1/asn1parse.1ssl installing man1/ca.1ssl installing man1/ciphers.1ssl installing man1/cms.1ssl cms.pod around line 457: Expected text after =item, not a number cms.pod around line 461: Expected text after =item, not a number cms.pod around line 465: Expected text after =item, not a number cms.pod around line 470: Expected text after =item, not a number cms.pod around line 474: Expected text after =item, not a number POD document had syntax errors at /usr/bin/core_perl/pod2man line 71. make: *** [install_docs] Error 1 [/code] The input file cms.pod has a simple list of items at the point of failure: [code] =item 0 the operation was completely successfully. =item 1 an error occurred parsing the command options. =item 2 one of the input files could not be read. <etc> [/code] and pod2man will not accept the "numeric" titles of the items. I tried putting an =encoding UTF-8 line at the head of this file but that did not help. Sorry, I don't know how to resolve this. I have not tried reverting perl to 5.16 Steps to reproduce: Try to rebuild openssl-1.0.1e-3 on an up-to-date system. |
This task depends upon
Comment by
Garry Roseman (sitquietly) -
Thursday, 20 June 2013, 21:22 GMT
Comment by
Dave Reisner (falconindy) -
Thursday, 20 June 2013, 21:25 GMT
Comment by
Garry Roseman (sitquietly) -
Thursday, 20 June 2013, 21:37 GMT
Comment by
Daniel Narvaez (dnarvaez) -
Wednesday, 16 October 2013, 14:40 GMT
Found the patch for fixing this from LFS. I'll test the patch...
semi-duplicate of
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/35829
That patch looks ok. A corrected PKGBUILD is attached.
For what it's worth, the patch works for me.