FS#35828 - n[xfce4-power-manager] PKGBUILD not use prepare functio

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Pablo Lezaeta (Jristz) - Monday, 17 June 2013, 06:11 GMT
Last edited by Evangelos Foutras (foutrelis) - Monday, 17 June 2013, 11:03 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To No-one
Architecture All
Severity Medium
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 1
Private No

Details

Description:
the actual PKGBUILD for not use prepare but add patch in build
I modify the PKGBUILD for add that

I not sure if email you with the attached file or fil a bug, I finally decide fil a bug and I want know additionally if this was the appropiate way for that things

I add the proper prepare function and add
modify the configure fallow other PKGBUILD that I see (officials) where --libdir is /usr/lib and --libexecdir is /usr/lib/$pgkname and since I read in the mailisting that usr/lib/$pkgname is for the libexec I add that too
   PKGBUILD (1.2 KiB)
This task depends upon

Closed by  Evangelos Foutras (foutrelis)
Monday, 17 June 2013, 11:03 GMT
Reason for closing:  Deferred
Additional comments about closing:  Like Allan said, I'll add prepare() in the next update. The libexecdir setting is correctly set to /usr/lib. (Stuff gets installed under /usr/lib/xfce4 or similar.)
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) - Monday, 17 June 2013, 06:22 GMT
Fairly sure that in this case the --libexec dir is fine. Also, prepare() functions will get use as things become updated. So there is nothing really wrong with the PKGBUILD...
Comment by Pablo Lezaeta (Jristz) - Monday, 17 June 2013, 06:33 GMT
but In this case that modification need to by filled in a bug like this or contacted directly (by mail) to the maintainer??

in this case those modification going to trunk only in any case
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) - Monday, 17 June 2013, 06:59 GMT
No need to open a bug or email the maintainer. It will get done on the next rebuild or update.

Loading...