Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#3500 - Extended LyX support
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Igor Galić (jMCg) - Thursday, 17 November 2005, 20:35 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Wednesday, 14 May 2008, 02:16 GMT
Opened by Igor Galić (jMCg) - Thursday, 17 November 2005, 20:35 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Wednesday, 14 May 2008, 02:16 GMT
|
DetailsAs the LyX package has quite some broad support it would be nice if archlinux could extend it's reach to meet it.
Currently the only two packages missing are sgmltools-lite and linuxdoc-tools -- in order to add docbook support and linux doc support to Lyx. I have tried my luck with sgmltools-lite but unfortunatly it was a little bit harder then i would have assumed it to be. And as my time is rather limited, I'm officially giving up and posting this feature request. P.S.: for those interested in packaging sgmltools-lite - you should have some basic knowledge of how to package python stuff. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Dan McGee (toofishes)
Wednesday, 14 May 2008, 02:16 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Additional comments about closing: Old bug is old. Closing.
Wednesday, 14 May 2008, 02:16 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Additional comments about closing: Old bug is old. Closing.
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) -
Saturday, 10 November 2007, 15:37 GMT
SGML is only used in very old projects now. So has time made this bug obsolete?