Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#34707 - [pacman] No free space detected with cache on ramfs
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by McFyrn (McFyrn) - Tuesday, 09 April 2013, 20:10 GMT
Last edited by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Friday, 12 April 2013, 13:08 GMT
Opened by McFyrn (McFyrn) - Tuesday, 09 April 2013, 20:10 GMT
Last edited by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Friday, 12 April 2013, 13:08 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
My pacman cache is on a ramfs; with pacman 4.1 I got an error when I try to install a package or update my system: error: Partition /var/cache/pacman too full: 559 blocks needed, 0 blocks free error: failed to commit transaction (not enough free disk space) I guess this error came with the commit 6e29f02e94022e141eced2e0cdcb5b85894317ad, if I'm not mistaken there was no free space check before. Additional info: * pacman 4.1 * CheckSpace uncommented in pacman.conf * fstab line for pacman cache: none /var/cache/pacman ramfs defaults 0 0 Steps to reproduce: 1/ Add the line to fstab 2/ Uncomment CheckSpace in pacman.conf 3/ Install or update a package |
This task depends upon
Closed by Dave Reisner (falconindy)
Friday, 12 April 2013, 13:08 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't fix
Additional comments about closing: ramfs isn't a real filesystem and will always report 0 size. If you insist on using it over tmpfs, then you'll need to disable CheckSpace.
Friday, 12 April 2013, 13:08 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't fix
Additional comments about closing: ramfs isn't a real filesystem and will always report 0 size. If you insist on using it over tmpfs, then you'll need to disable CheckSpace.
Comment by Dave Reisner (falconindy) -
Thursday, 11 April 2013, 13:39 GMT
Why on earth would you use ramfs over tmpfs?