Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#34351 - [pacman] The --print option does not print any line for an ignored package
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by Connor Behan (connorbehan) - Monday, 18 March 2013, 05:38 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Thursday, 09 May 2013, 23:35 GMT
Opened by Connor Behan (connorbehan) - Monday, 18 March 2013, 05:38 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Thursday, 09 May 2013, 23:35 GMT
|
DetailsSet IgnorePkg=foo and run pacman -Sp foo. Instead of seeing the URL for the package foo as stored on the highest priority mirror, you will see an empty string. This is a bug since documentation says --ignore will only take effect on a sysupgrade operation not a print. Moreover, this behaviour is confusing since it is the opposite of what --noconfirm would do. The options --noconfirm and --print are both supposed to surpress questions. However the question "Foo is in IgnorePkg/IgnoreGrp install anyway?" defaults to "yes" with --noconfirm meaning that pacman will continue the operation and install the package. However, the same question defaults to "no" with --print meaning that pacman stops what it is doing and returns. The reason for this in the code is fairly clear. The question_cb function returns without a value whenever config->print is TRUE, leaving the value at the mercy of libalpm. It should really return predictable default values similar to how config->noconfirm would. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Allan McRae (Allan)
Thursday, 09 May 2013, 23:35 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: git commit ee3b70c4
Thursday, 09 May 2013, 23:35 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: git commit ee3b70c4
--print _asks_ about ignored packages. (Edit: That would break "pacman -Sup > download.list")
If you wish to automatically print all ignored packages, use --noconfirm _with_ --print.
My reason for this is that you may use "pacman -Sup" to get the links to all packages for _the exact operation_ you want to do, so that you can download them on another system.
What you are asking seems to make that impossible (barring grepping out the ignored packages).
pacman -Su does not ask, it just says "skipping foo."
The patch I'm proposing would only change the API when a question is asked. So the behaviour of -Sp changes but -Sup does not.