Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#3391 - kernel26mm ncpfs options :-)
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Neil Streeter (linuxfool) - Wednesday, 26 October 2005, 20:06 GMT
Last edited by Dale Blount (dale) - Wednesday, 26 October 2005, 20:15 GMT
Opened by Neil Streeter (linuxfool) - Wednesday, 26 October 2005, 20:06 GMT
Last edited by Dale Blount (dale) - Wednesday, 26 October 2005, 20:15 GMT
|
DetailsI recently became interested in the -mm patchset. I quickly discovered the NCPFS options suffered the same fate as kernel26 some time ago. I don't know if the maintainer is interested in making NCPFS support nice with the -mm patchset, but thought I'd let ya know.
The 'issue' is described here: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/2565 Thanks for the great distro. Take care, ns |
This task depends upon
Closed by Thomas Bächler (brain0)
Sunday, 29 October 2006, 23:05 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: This bug is stone old. I think the new kernel26mm packages have right ncpfs options.
Sunday, 29 October 2006, 23:05 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: This bug is stone old. I think the new kernel26mm packages have right ncpfs options.
unfortunately the mm-tree was for some weeks now under tty-buffering-API change and lots of tty devices didn't build. now they updated most of them and i'm thinking about releasing a new kernel26mm soon with the not-building-yet disabled. when i do this, i will addapt the config to suit your ncpfs needs.