Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Reporting_Bug_Guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in Unsupported. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#33459 - [systemd] systemd-readahead: Failed to read event: Value too large for defined data type

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Dominik Brzeziński (kelloco2) - Saturday, 19 January 2013, 15:02 GMT
Last edited by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Wednesday, 22 May 2013, 15:38 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Upstream Bugs
Status Closed
Assigned To Dave Reisner (falconindy)
Architecture All
Severity Medium
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 1
Private No

Details

Description:

systemd-readahead does not work if you have a swapfile instead of swap partition.



hash entry in the /etc/fstab temporarily solved the problem. After
"systemd-readahead: Failed to read event: Value too large for defined data type"
no new lines are appended. ( cat /.readahead | wc -l ).
This task depends upon

Closed by  Dave Reisner (falconindy)
Wednesday, 22 May 2013, 15:38 GMT
Reason for closing:  Upstream
Additional comments about closing:  Not a systemd bug, and the posted patch is likely incorrect.
Comment by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Saturday, 19 January 2013, 15:48 GMT
These sorts of things need to be reported upstream, not here.
Comment by Dominik Brzeziński (kelloco2) - Sunday, 20 January 2013, 15:08 GMT
Sorry, I'm still learning. I would add that the problem may be if the swap file is more than 2GB.
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1219816#p1219816
Comment by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Sunday, 17 February 2013, 19:53 GMT
Looks like a kernel bug, actually. A patch appeared on LKML a few days ago:

http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1441629
Comment by Dominik Brzeziński (kelloco2) - Tuesday, 19 February 2013, 19:02 GMT
Thanks a lot. I hope this will be fixed. If not, I will try to patch itself

Loading...