Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#3317 - OpenOffine.org fake italics and bold fonts display
|
DetailsHi
As some fonts have no italic and bold style.For example Bitstream Vera Serif is without italic style. Even more bad, Chines fonts are only have regular style.So it can't display italic and bold style fonts in openoffice. Fortunately this problem can resolve by this patch http://firefly.idv.tw/setfont-xft/patches/openoffice/1.9.130/openoffice-1.9.m130-vcl-virtualstyles-20050919.patch The patch is make by firefly (firefly@firefly.idv.tw) and released under GPL.With the patch openoffice can displays fake italics and bold style fonts that have no true italics and bold style.No matter what language characters,if it have no true italics and bold style fonts,the patch can make them display fake italics and bold style fonts.It is important things feature to openoffice. The patch also commited to upstream,But the openoffice developer team seem are unconcern about this.The patch seem will not apply to the comming openoffice 2.0 . We hope arch can adopt this patch. more detail about the parch : http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285 |
This task depends upon
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=16822&start=45&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=
Good news! fake italics and bold patch has added by go-ooo.It work well on Ubuntu's ooo-m143 build.
Andy your PKGBUILD is m146 version,so I thinks fake italics and bold is work well in this build.
Tobias Powalowski,JGC any plan for merging oo-build to Arch ?