FS#33156 - digikam from [kde-unstable] doesn't start due to libkipi- and libkdcraw- versions

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by phanisvara das (phani00) - Friday, 21 December 2012, 17:48 GMT
Last edited by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) - Saturday, 22 December 2012, 04:59 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To No-one
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description: trying to start digikam, it tries to open earlier versions of libkipi- and libkdcraw libraries. probably needs to be compiled against the newer ones.

not sure if this is an arch or upstream problem, so i'm reporting it here first...


Additional info:
* package version(s): digikam & libkipi-plugins ver. 2.9.0-3 from [kde-unstable]
This task depends upon

Closed by  Andrea Scarpino (BaSh)
Saturday, 22 December 2012, 04:59 GMT
Reason for closing:  Not a bug
Additional comments about closing:  https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? id=153419&p=1
Comment by Antonio Rojas (arojas) - Friday, 21 December 2012, 18:02 GMT
It's neither arch nor upstream, you're expected to rebuild it yourself if you use [kde-unstable]
Comment by phanisvara das (phani00) - Friday, 21 December 2012, 18:06 GMT
hm, i don't mind, but that wasn't obvious for me. [kde-unstable] provides binaries after all, and so far they've been working w/o recompiling. is this something special with digikam?
Comment by Greg (dolby) - Friday, 21 December 2012, 18:27 GMT
its not part of kde sc. kde-unstable only has kde sc not extragear.
see https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1196794#p1196794
Comment by Antonio Rojas (arojas) - Friday, 21 December 2012, 18:27 GMT
[kde-unstable] provides KDE SC packages, digikam is not part of it. Read https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=153419&p=1 if you use the [kde-unstable] repo.
Notice that digikam 2.6.x does not build against KDE 4.10, you will need 3.0 beta
Comment by phanisvara das (phani00) - Friday, 21 December 2012, 18:35 GMT
i'm sorry, you're right, of course. didn't do my homework. just assumed digikam was part of the repo since it has been working until now.

Loading...