Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#3307 - filelist missing in webinterface
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Benjamin Andresen (klapmuetz) - Friday, 07 October 2005, 11:50 GMT
Last edited by arjan timmerman (blaasvis) - Wednesday, 02 November 2005, 10:26 GMT
Opened by Benjamin Andresen (klapmuetz) - Friday, 07 October 2005, 11:50 GMT
Last edited by arjan timmerman (blaasvis) - Wednesday, 02 November 2005, 10:26 GMT
|
DetailsHello, it looks like that every package that got updated on the first october, i.e:
lesstif (http://archlinux.de/packages.php?op=files&id=4108) opencdk (http://archlinux.de/packages.php?op=files&id=4137) gdk-pixpuf (http://archlinux.de/packages.php?op=files&id=4099) have a missing filelist in the webinterface. Looks like something went wrong, at the transition from testing to current. On a similar note: Is it possible to get a "missing-lib" file search? When you load a program and you get an error that a lib is missing you can check the web for what package you have to install to get the missing lib. I wrote a small program to do that, but it's not very friendly to the webserver, traffic-wise, esspecially if everybody would build their own database using it. It would be an idea to deploy it directly on the server. I think it would be a helpful function and from observing the IRC-channel, greatly appreciated. Should I open a feature request instead? TIA and BR, Benny |
This task depends upon
Closed by arjan timmerman (blaasvis)
Thursday, 23 March 2006, 11:34 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: archlinux.de isn't under our control...
and .org worked :)
Thursday, 23 March 2006, 11:34 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: archlinux.de isn't under our control...
and .org worked :)
Comment by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) -
Wednesday, 28 December 2005, 15:29 GMT
I confirm this. There are also other packages that have blank filelists.