Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#32891 - Bad symlinks in 'multilib' repository

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Igor V. Mashentsev (BeerMan) - Wednesday, 28 November 2012, 15:46 GMT
Last edited by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Saturday, 20 April 2013, 15:29 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Mirrors
Status Closed
Assigned To No-one
Architecture All
Severity Very Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

rsync show many 'symlink has no referent' errors in 'multilib' repository.

I'l try three mirrors:
- rsync://distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr/archlinux
- rsync://archlinux.c3sl.ufpr.br/archlinux
- rsync://ftp.linux.kiev.ua/pub/Linux/ArchLinux

log file in attachment.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Dave Reisner (falconindy)
Saturday, 20 April 2013, 15:29 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  symlinks have been removed. please reopen if this is still a problem after the next sync
Comment by Jelle van der Waa (jelly) - Sunday, 23 December 2012, 10:24 GMT
Still a problem?
Comment by Igor V. Mashentsev (BeerMan) - Tuesday, 25 December 2012, 20:30 GMT
Yes.
I think that packets in 'pool' was deleted (updated), but in 'multilib' folder links was remained...
Comment by Oleg Lyashko (ovl) - Saturday, 20 April 2013, 03:50 GMT
Can confirm this on mirrors

rsync://mirror.rit.edu/archlinux
rsync://mirror.us.leaseweb.net/archlinux
rsync://mirror.yandex.ru/archlinux

Sure this is "Very Low" priority issue. But it seems, to delete dozen invalid links is not really big problem.
Comment by Igor V. Mashentsev (BeerMan) - Saturday, 20 April 2013, 15:11 GMT
Ok. On this mirrors same "problem".
See attached logs.

> Sure this is "Very Low" priority issue. But it seems, to delete dozen invalid links is not really big problem.
Yes, of course. :)

Loading...