Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#32891 - Bad symlinks in 'multilib' repository
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Igor V. Mashentsev (BeerMan) - Wednesday, 28 November 2012, 15:46 GMT
Last edited by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Saturday, 20 April 2013, 15:29 GMT
Opened by Igor V. Mashentsev (BeerMan) - Wednesday, 28 November 2012, 15:46 GMT
Last edited by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Saturday, 20 April 2013, 15:29 GMT
|
Detailsrsync show many 'symlink has no referent' errors in 'multilib' repository.
I'l try three mirrors: - rsync://distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr/archlinux - rsync://archlinux.c3sl.ufpr.br/archlinux - rsync://ftp.linux.kiev.ua/pub/Linux/ArchLinux log file in attachment. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Dave Reisner (falconindy)
Saturday, 20 April 2013, 15:29 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: symlinks have been removed. please reopen if this is still a problem after the next sync
Saturday, 20 April 2013, 15:29 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: symlinks have been removed. please reopen if this is still a problem after the next sync
sync_err.log
I think that packets in 'pool' was deleted (updated), but in 'multilib' folder links was remained...
rsync://mirror.rit.edu/archlinux
rsync://mirror.us.leaseweb.net/archlinux
rsync://mirror.yandex.ru/archlinux
Sure this is "Very Low" priority issue. But it seems, to delete dozen invalid links is not really big problem.
See attached logs.
> Sure this is "Very Low" priority issue. But it seems, to delete dozen invalid links is not really big problem.
Yes, of course. :)