Pacman

Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.

The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues

This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
Tasklist

FS#3263 - grub can't upgrade /usr/share/grub: exists in filesystem

Attached to Project: Pacman
Opened by Daniel YC Lin (dlin) - Sunday, 02 October 2005, 13:43 GMT
Last edited by Judd Vinet (judd) - Sunday, 02 October 2005, 18:48 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category
Status Closed
Assigned To Judd Vinet (judd)
Architecture not specified
Severity Medium
Priority Normal
Reported Version 0.7 Wombat
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

ref: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=15361
when I upgrade from 0.95-2 to 0.97-1, there occurs message

error: the following file conflicts were found:
grub: /usr/share/grub: exists in filesystem

If grub can't do direct upgrade, I suggest there should exist document when we run 'pacman -Syu'.
This task depends upon

Closed by  arjan timmerman (blaasvis)
Saturday, 25 March 2006, 22:05 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  seems to be fine now...
Comment by Judd Vinet (judd) - Sunday, 02 October 2005, 18:48 GMT
If you still have your pacman db (BEFORE succeeding in upgrading grub), please tar/gzip it and send it to me.
Comment by Daniel YC Lin (dlin) - Sunday, 02 October 2005, 23:31 GMT
do you mean you want grub-0.95-2.pkg.tar.gz ?
Comment by Judd Vinet (judd) - Monday, 03 October 2005, 20:07 GMT
Actually, nevermind. I think I can reproduce without your database.

As a workaround, you can uninstall/reinstall grub.

# pacman -Rd grub
# pacman -S grub

Afterwards, make sure your /boot/grub/menu.lst is still correct.
Comment by Daniel YC Lin (dlin) - Tuesday, 04 October 2005, 11:22 GMT
Yes, I known the workaround method. But I wish the upgrade system should be smarter :).
Comment by arjan timmerman (blaasvis) - Thursday, 23 March 2006, 08:01 GMT
is this solved ?

Loading...