Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#3242 - pacman wishlist (2/4): Deprecation of -Qe in favour of better alternatives
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by Mark Rosenstand (mrose) - Wednesday, 28 September 2005, 00:07 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Wednesday, 24 January 2007, 11:23 GMT
Opened by Mark Rosenstand (mrose) - Wednesday, 28 September 2005, 00:07 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Wednesday, 24 January 2007, 11:23 GMT
|
Detailsa) Query option to list all packages that were installed as dependencies but
are no longer depended upon by any installed package. Like a global -Rn, but only querying. Removing will probably be to point revolvers at too many people's feet. b) Query option to list all explicitly installed packages, whether depended upon by other packages or not. This will reduce the amount of boringness associated with cleaning out packages, as you won't have to re-read the output of -Qe every time you remove a package because it had unwanted dependencies which were also explicitly installed. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka)
Wednesday, 24 January 2007, 11:39 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/4130
Wednesday, 24 January 2007, 11:39 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/4130
Comment by Mark Rosenstand (mrose) -
Saturday, 01 October 2005, 13:35 GMT
D'oh. In a), of course I meant a global -Rs.
Comment by Mark Rosenstand (mrose) -
Saturday, 01 October 2005, 13:41 GMT
I think that a) should actually replace --orphans (-e could get another long name), as this is closer to "expected behaviour" for an option of that name.