Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#32221 - [nodejs] nodejs-0.8.12-2 and v8, npm install results in segmentation fault
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by mojo (mojo) - Thursday, 25 October 2012, 16:46 GMT
Last edited by Bartłomiej Piotrowski (Barthalion) - Thursday, 15 November 2012, 05:39 GMT
Opened by mojo (mojo) - Thursday, 25 October 2012, 16:46 GMT
Last edited by Bartłomiej Piotrowski (Barthalion) - Thursday, 15 November 2012, 05:39 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Straight up update via pacman -Syu Installing any node module with npm results in a segmentation fault. eg: $ npm install buffet npm http GET https://registry.npmjs.org/buffet npm http 304 https://registry.npmjs.org/buffet npm http GET https://registry.npmjs.org/buffet/-/buffet-0.4.6.tgz Segmentation fault Workaround is to downgrade to previous version (without v8 dependency) nodejs-0.8.12-1 Additional info: architecture: x86_64 nodejs-0.8.12-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz v8-3.14.0-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz Steps to reproduce: npm install <node module> or npm install -g <node module> |
This task depends upon
Closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski (Barthalion)
Thursday, 15 November 2012, 05:39 GMT
Reason for closing: Works for me
Thursday, 15 November 2012, 05:39 GMT
Reason for closing: Works for me
I managed to fixed it here. Just change the find/sed lines related with fixing the python2 name to the previous ones and it will work. If you don't do that, it won't work, even with the new version of node. Some of the new sed lines should be wrong or missing.
@Tom: Reverting find-related lines doesn't change a thing, at least for me.