Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#31730 - [hub] does a gem based install rather than standalone
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Saturday, 29 September 2012, 14:43 GMT
Last edited by Daniel Wallace (gtmanfred) - Saturday, 29 September 2012, 18:53 GMT
Opened by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Saturday, 29 September 2012, 14:43 GMT
Last edited by Daniel Wallace (gtmanfred) - Saturday, 29 September 2012, 18:53 GMT
|
Detailshub is meant for git powerusers, so wrapping it in rubygems seems like a poor idea from an execution standpoint. The PKGBUILD is a bit of a mess, too. As per the upstream doc, an "all-in-one" standalone version is available. This is what the AUR package did. The current PKGBUILD even generates this standalone version, but then eschews it and runs "gem install" anyways.
Suggested PKGBUILD attached, which also include the git-hooks subdir in the source tarball. Also fixes a hilarious mistake on the first line, which only works by chance because $Id expands to nothing, leave a ":" behind, which does nothing, and ignores all its arguments. 
PKGBUILD
(1.1 KiB)
|
This task depends upon
Closed by Daniel Wallace (gtmanfred)
Saturday, 29 September 2012, 18:53 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: fixed in -4
Saturday, 29 September 2012, 18:53 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: fixed in -4