Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#31726 - [dbus] package naming
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Matthew Monaco (dgbaley27) - Saturday, 29 September 2012, 03:43 GMT
Last edited by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Saturday, 29 September 2012, 07:22 GMT
Opened by Matthew Monaco (dgbaley27) - Saturday, 29 September 2012, 03:43 GMT
Last edited by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Saturday, 29 September 2012, 07:22 GMT
|
DetailsIMO
dbus-core should really be dbus dbus should be something like dbus-x11 or dbus-x11-utils Or at least let dbus-core provide dbus. There's probably a lot of people that don't need the dbus-x11 stuff, and certainly no one that only needs dbus-x11 without dbus(-core). |
This task depends upon
Closed by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR)
Saturday, 29 September 2012, 07:22 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't fix
Saturday, 29 September 2012, 07:22 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't fix
Comment by Dave Reisner (falconindy) -
Saturday, 29 September 2012, 03:51 GMT
-1. Useless name swap will only cause unnecessary confusion.