Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#31457 - [plan9port] renaming installed files is not good idea
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Friday, 07 September 2012, 16:41 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Friday, 02 November 2012, 15:52 GMT
Opened by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Friday, 07 September 2012, 16:41 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Friday, 02 November 2012, 15:52 GMT
|
DetailsIt breaks checking system integrity.
Steps to reproduce: # pacman -S plan9port # pacman -Qkq | grep plan9port (I mean gunzipping in post_install()) |
This task depends upon
Comment by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) -
Friday, 02 November 2012, 15:52 GMT
I just moved decompressing from .install to pkgbuild for now.