Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#31104 - [linux-lts] Is linux-lts really for servers??
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by 謝致邦 (Red54) - Saturday, 11 August 2012, 12:47 GMT
Last edited by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) - Saturday, 11 August 2012, 14:27 GMT
Opened by 謝致邦 (Red54) - Saturday, 11 August 2012, 12:47 GMT
Last edited by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) - Saturday, 11 August 2012, 14:27 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Is linux-lts really for servers?? Why the setting of Preemption Model is for Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop), not for No Forced Preemption (Server)?? The setting is in Processor type and features -> Preemption Model. Additional info: * package version(s) 3.0.39-1 and 3.0.40-1 * config and/or log files etc. config and config.x86_64 Steps to reproduce: Just check the config files in menuconfig, nconfig, xconfig, qconf or gconfig. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa)
Saturday, 11 August 2012, 14:27 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: fixed in trunk will be in 3.0.41-1
Saturday, 11 August 2012, 14:27 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: fixed in trunk will be in 3.0.41-1
No idea if these settings have changed somehow meanwhile.
Seems this point has changed during the 3.0.x bump and noone has seen this for over 8 months.