Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#30928 - [mutt] Apply patch to allow re-naming of digital signature
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Andrew Wong (w0ng) - Monday, 30 July 2012, 19:58 GMT
Last edited by Gaetan Bisson (vesath) - Monday, 30 July 2012, 23:26 GMT
Opened by Andrew Wong (w0ng) - Monday, 30 July 2012, 19:58 GMT
Last edited by Gaetan Bisson (vesath) - Monday, 30 July 2012, 23:26 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
I'm using GnuPG to sign emails automatically. Attaching gpg signatures to outbound mail shows up as "noname" to recipients. Patch allows signature to be renamed to something more meaningful like signature.asc Patch has already been applied upstream, but that was 20 months ago. Proposed PKGBUILD included. Additional info: Package: mutt 1.5.21-6 Official ticket: http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3478 before: 
PKGBUILD
(1.3 KiB)
|
This task depends upon
Nevertheless, I prefer not to patch non-critical features, particularly with Mutt when if I did this I would be crawling under patches and duplicating upstream's work.