Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#30902 - [initscripts] archlinux(7) manpage
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Asher Higgs (alphaniner) - Sunday, 29 July 2012, 04:33 GMT
Last edited by Tom Gundersen (tomegun) - Tuesday, 28 August 2012, 21:39 GMT
Opened by Asher Higgs (alphaniner) - Sunday, 29 July 2012, 04:33 GMT
Last edited by Tom Gundersen (tomegun) - Tuesday, 28 August 2012, 21:39 GMT
|
Details1) In the HOSTNAME section, the instruction for what to put in /etc/hostname is ambiguous. Saying 'the hostname should be set' implies a variable. The "Installation Guide" wiki page is much clearer: "Write your hostname to /etc/hostname."
2) In the LOCALIZATION section, /etc/locale-gen is referenced instead of /etc/locale.gen |
This task depends upon
Closed by Tom Gundersen (tomegun)
Tuesday, 28 August 2012, 21:39 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: clarified the hostname business in svn, the other issues were already fixed. sorry for taking long in dealing with this.
Tuesday, 28 August 2012, 21:39 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: clarified the hostname business in svn, the other issues were already fixed. sorry for taking long in dealing with this.
http://projects.archlinux.org/initscripts.git/commit/?id=ecdcf3795e88c8e6a2c39321d8164798ba652df6
I think the hostname business is self-explanatory if you read the manpage for it.
I scanned the hostname manpage at the time and didn't notice anything about the file.
Nevertheless, why favor a longer and ambiguous instruction over a clear and concise one?
From hostname(5):
"[/etc/hostname] should contain a single newline-terminated host name string"
Suggestions welcome on how to make that more clear and concise.
If you think my problem with the statement in archlinux(7) is absurd, pedantic, or anal, that's perfectly acceptable to me. If you close it as wontfix, that's no skin off my back. But don't quote an entirely different sentence from an entirely different manpage and suggest that's what I was talking about.