Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#30572 - [postfix] add support for cdb database
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Geert Hendrickx (ghen) - Friday, 06 July 2012, 15:40 GMT
Last edited by Gaetan Bisson (vesath) - Sunday, 08 July 2012, 02:04 GMT
Opened by Geert Hendrickx (ghen) - Friday, 06 July 2012, 15:40 GMT
Last edited by Gaetan Bisson (vesath) - Sunday, 08 July 2012, 02:04 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
I am running Postfix with cdb database files (tinycdb implementation). Cdb is gaining popularity amongst Postfix admins due to its better performance and smaller size compared to the traditional Berkeley DB hash/btree databases. Cdb is read-only so not suitable for Postfix r/w databases, but it is a very useful option nevertheless ("postmap" also rebuilds hash/btree files from scratch anyway). The Arch Postfix package already has dependencies on ldap, mysql, postgresql, sqlite and others, so this one small library doesn't add much weight to the package. Additional info: See http://www.postfix.org/CDB_README.html for more information. Steps to reproduce: See the diff in attachment. tinycdb package is in [community]. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Gaetan Bisson (vesath)
Sunday, 08 July 2012, 02:04 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: tinycdb-0.78-1 and postfix-2.9.3-2 in [extra]
Sunday, 08 July 2012, 02:04 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: tinycdb-0.78-1 and postfix-2.9.3-2 in [extra]
Comment by Gaetan Bisson (vesath) -
Saturday, 07 July 2012, 03:18 GMT
Could you try tinycdb-0.78-1 and postfix-2.9.3-2 from [testing] and see if everything behaves as expected?
Comment by Geert Hendrickx (ghen) -
Saturday, 07 July 2012, 11:46 GMT
Seems fine, both i686 and x86_64. Thanks!
postfix_cdb.diff