Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#30370 - [postfix] Missing recommended non-manpage documentation
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Alex Pilon (alp) - Wednesday, 20 June 2012, 01:48 GMT
Last edited by Gaetan Bisson (vesath) - Wednesday, 20 June 2012, 04:58 GMT
Opened by Alex Pilon (alp) - Wednesday, 20 June 2012, 01:48 GMT
Last edited by Gaetan Bisson (vesath) - Wednesday, 20 June 2012, 04:58 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Postfix is missing the HTML and plain text documentation that comes bundled with the source. Quoting from the Postfix [guidelines for package builders](http://www.postfix.org/PACKAGE_README.html). "Please provide the applicable README or HTML files. They are referenced by the Postfix manual pages and by other files. Without README or HTML files, Postfix will be difficult if not impossible to configure." Additional info: Package version: 2.9.3-1 Steps to reproduce: `pacman -Ql postfix | grep html\$ | wc -l` should give 0. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Gaetan Bisson (vesath)
Wednesday, 20 June 2012, 04:58 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: In SVN.
Wednesday, 20 June 2012, 04:58 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: In SVN.
Comment by Gaetan Bisson (vesath) -
Wednesday, 20 June 2012, 04:58 GMT
The README files will be in the next postfix release (see SVN); I'm not including the HTML files though, as they are simply duplicates of the README files and of the man pages.