Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#30343 - Bug/annoyance with --downloadonly not working with Ignorepkg.
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by Scott (fu-fu) - Monday, 18 June 2012, 18:23 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Tuesday, 29 March 2016, 10:10 GMT
Opened by Scott (fu-fu) - Monday, 18 June 2012, 18:23 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Tuesday, 29 March 2016, 10:10 GMT
|
DetailsSummary and Info:
Running pacman with a Ignorepkg=<package> will prompt weather or not you want to install that updated package (I assume only if there is an update) However, with the option -w added, it will not prompt, and try to install the latest. I was trying to get a ppc install of arch in a folder so that I could put it on my wii, Glibc was over-updated(?) and was requiring linux-api-headers 3.2 while the repos only had 3.1.6, I got a version of glibc from a previous attempt at trying this (It was for 3.1.6). I was trying to make it so that if the setup failed I wouldn't have to re download the cache (the -w option), It kept trying to update Glibc regardless of Noupgrade=glibc and Ignorepkg=glibc set in the pacman.conf. However, without the -w option, it questions weather you want to update it, and will then proceed. Steps to Reproduce: Get version of a package that's not the newest and has a missing dependency (or over-updated), pacman -Syw <package>, it will give: warning: cannot resolve <dependency package>, a dependency of <package>. However without the -w option, it will prompt if you want to update it. |
This task depends upon
FS#32652for a better explanation. In summary, -Sw does not consider --ignore