Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#3034 - pam-0.80-2 seems to break memlock limit
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Ash (Thikasabrik) - Wednesday, 03 August 2005, 16:41 GMT
Last edited by arjan timmerman (blaasvis) - Wednesday, 02 November 2005, 10:22 GMT
Opened by Ash (Thikasabrik) - Wednesday, 03 August 2005, 16:41 GMT
Last edited by arjan timmerman (blaasvis) - Wednesday, 02 November 2005, 10:22 GMT
|
DetailsWith the 2.6.13-rc5 kernel (with working rtprio limit support) and the new PAM in testing, 'ulimit -l' gives 0 even through my limits.conf defines the memlock limit for the audio group, of which I am a member, as 350000. The limit also appears to be 0 for root! The rtprio limits work fine, but jack etc cannot lock memory any more...
|
This task depends upon
Closed by arjan timmerman (blaasvis)
Sunday, 26 March 2006, 11:08 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: works for me now.
Sunday, 26 March 2006, 11:08 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: works for me now.
I just did a testbuild of 0.99.1.0 BETA (from here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/pam-list/2005-September/msg00024.html)
That solved the issue for me, but I dun feel like backporting upstream issues. If you like to build it yourself be aware that this snapshot has full autotools support, hence you have to tweak the PKGBUILD a bit...