Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#30089 - [aurphan] Please add links to todo and bugs output
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Alan Young (harleypig) - Friday, 01 June 2012, 02:22 GMT
Last edited by Kyle Keen (keenerd) - Friday, 15 June 2012, 14:41 GMT
Opened by Alan Young (harleypig) - Friday, 01 June 2012, 02:22 GMT
Last edited by Kyle Keen (keenerd) - Friday, 15 June 2012, 14:41 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
I think this application is a great way to get people involved. I'm having difficulty finding the relevant page for the todo and bugs output. Having a link for the orphaned packages made it extremely easy for me to adopt a couple of packages I needed. |
This task depends upon
Comment by Kyle Keen (keenerd) -
Friday, 15 June 2012, 02:38 GMT
What page would be appropriate? --todo, --bugs and --packages are all for official packages. These don't really have good pages anywhere. The https://www.archlinux.org/packages/ url is basically just a rehash of the 'pacman -Si' output and does not seem worth linking to. And those official URLs are always longer than 50 characters and there is no way I can make that look good.
Comment by Alan Young (harleypig) -
Friday, 15 June 2012, 05:51 GMT
As for making the urls look good, a shortener would be ok. But that's moot at this point. I've learned a bit since I submitted this and I think you're right. You can close this request without any argument from me.