Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#29874 - [awesome] Split naughty into separate package?
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Ezekiel Sulastin (ZekeSulastin) - Sunday, 13 May 2012, 16:12 GMT
Last edited by Sébastien Luttringer (seblu) - Tuesday, 15 May 2012, 18:57 GMT
Opened by Ezekiel Sulastin (ZekeSulastin) - Sunday, 13 May 2012, 16:12 GMT
Last edited by Sébastien Luttringer (seblu) - Tuesday, 15 May 2012, 18:57 GMT
|
DetailsAs noted in this thread (https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=141443), some people may want to use awesome with a separate notification-daemon. However, awesome currently provides this due to the notification module naughty; this is great if you just want to use that, but as noted in that thread it can lead to excess hassle if you want to use something else in its place.
Upstream ships everything in one big happy family, but would it be feasible to split the package here, make naughty an optdepend of awesome, and have naughty provide notification-daemon? |
This task depends upon
Closed by Sébastien Luttringer (seblu)
Tuesday, 15 May 2012, 18:57 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Tuesday, 15 May 2012, 18:57 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Provide notification-daemon, doesn't conflict with other package also provide it, without force conflicts.