Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#29070 - [zathura] Multiple PDF backends
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Moritz Lipp (mlq) - Friday, 23 March 2012, 10:09 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Tuesday, 18 September 2012, 16:19 GMT
Opened by Moritz Lipp (mlq) - Friday, 23 March 2012, 10:09 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Tuesday, 18 September 2012, 16:19 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Since the zathura-pdf-poppler package is available to the archlinux community I was wondering why the zathura-pdf-mupdf plugin is not. Since #28498 has been closed already it is possible to build it without a patched mupdf package. For this reason I've attached two new PKGBUILDs for both, zathura-pdf-poppler and zathura-pdf-mupdf, which have updated dependencies (with version checks) as well as a 'provides' field to allow the usage of 'zathura-pdf'. Therefore I would suggest to update zathura's PKGBUILD as well with new optdepends like in the attached PKGBUILD (which additionally fixes the ZATHURA_GTK_VERSION setting in the install target). |
This task depends upon
Closed by Sergej Pupykin (sergej)
Tuesday, 18 September 2012, 16:19 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Tuesday, 18 September 2012, 16:19 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
PKGBUILD-zathura-pdf-mupdf
Btw, the "|| return 1" statments are no longer neccesary.
That said, I'm all for a mupdf plugin, as poppler crashes a lot lately due to stack smashing being detected.