Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#28716 - Improve 'pacman -Sy' output for signed databases
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by Karol Błażewicz (karol) - Wednesday, 29 February 2012, 16:25 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Wednesday, 29 February 2012, 20:36 GMT
Opened by Karol Błażewicz (karol) - Wednesday, 29 February 2012, 16:25 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Wednesday, 29 February 2012, 20:36 GMT
|
Details$ pacman -Sy
:: Synchronizing package databases... testing 96,2 KiB 326K/s 00:00 [###########################] 100% community-testing 2,1 KiB 1877K/s 00:00 [###########################] 100% core 105,2 KiB 347K/s 00:00 [###########################] 100% extra 1391,3 KiB 675K/s 00:02 [###########################] 100% community 1538,6 KiB 679K/s 00:02 [###########################] 100% xyne-any 6,0 KiB 28,3K/s 00:00 [###########################] 100% xyne-any.sig 287,0 B 272B/s 00:01 [###########################] 100% I think the 'xyne-any.sig' line should go. I'm using pacman 4.0.2-1. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Allan McRae (Allan)
Wednesday, 29 February 2012, 20:36 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Wednesday, 29 February 2012, 20:36 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
- pacman is very much transparent wherever it can be. hiding random downloads goes against this.
- it makes any network latency on this particular download more obvious. A random delay between two repo downloads would just result in stupid bug reports explaining why we thought it was valuable to remove this output. rest assured that while im very much aware of why this single line needs to be sent to the big bit bucket in the sky, i'd assign these bug reports to you for a detailed explanation.
- If the database is later shown as corrupted or invalid and you didn't see such a download, this will be confusing (cue more stupid bug reports).
Feel free to convince me otherwise.
I guess package signing and database signing is different enough to warrant different approaches:
http://allanmcrae.com/2011/08/pacman-package-signing-3-pacman/
"Beyond that, the checking of PGP signatures occurs during the usual package integrity check stage so will go largely unnoticed unless something goes wrong."
> pacman -U file:///home/allan/web/allanbrokeit/i686/patch-2.6.1.136-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz
patch-2.6.1.136-1-i686 73.8 KiB 72.1M/s 00:00 [######################] 100%
patch-2.6.1.136-1-i... 287.0 B 2.95K/s 00:00 [######################] 100%
loading packages...