Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#28596 - [tomcat7] missing link to eclipse-ecj.jar
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Patrick Muchmore (pmuchmor) - Thursday, 23 February 2012, 04:02 GMT
Last edited by Guillaume ALAUX (galaux) - Sunday, 01 April 2012, 14:17 GMT
Opened by Patrick Muchmore (pmuchmor) - Thursday, 23 February 2012, 04:02 GMT
Last edited by Guillaume ALAUX (galaux) - Sunday, 01 April 2012, 14:17 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
tomcat7 is missing a link to eclipse-ecj (a prerequisite package) in the directory /usr/share/tomcat7/lib. Without this link it is not possible to compile JSP. This problem occurred to me within eclipse and has also been reported in netbeans, https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=135775 Additional info: * package version(s) * config and/or log files etc. This can be fixed adding a link to the eclipse-ecj install ln -s /usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj-3.7.1.jar /usr/share/tomcat7/lib/eclipse-ecj.jar which should probably be included in the default install. Steps to reproduce: |
This task depends upon
Closed by Guillaume ALAUX (galaux)
Sunday, 01 April 2012, 14:17 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Fixed in 7.0.26-1
Sunday, 01 April 2012, 14:17 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Fixed in 7.0.26-1
Comment by Psycho McStabStab (Leave_This_Place) -
Sunday, 18 March 2012, 05:57 GMT
I am also getting this problem. I don't understand why they would remove that file intentionally. It's a bad sign when the generic package is better configured than the one available in the repos. It means either the package maintainer is incompetent or malicious.
Comment by Guillaume ALAUX (galaux) -
Sunday, 01 April 2012, 14:17 GMT
You're wrong: I'm both.