Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#28509 - [widelands-data] got 109 MB bigger from 16-1 to 16-2 ?
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Matthias Krüger (matthiaskrgr) - Saturday, 18 February 2012, 18:08 GMT
Last edited by Sven-Hendrik Haase (Svenstaro) - Saturday, 18 February 2012, 23:16 GMT
Opened by Matthias Krüger (matthiaskrgr) - Saturday, 18 February 2012, 18:08 GMT
Last edited by Sven-Hendrik Haase (Svenstaro) - Saturday, 18 February 2012, 23:16 GMT
|
Detailspacman -S widelands-data
resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... Targets (1): widelands-data-16-2 Total Download Size: 118.62 MiB Total Installed Size: 258.64 MiB Net Upgrade Size: 109.37 MiB Proceed with installation? [Y/n] + 109 MB, seriously? Or do I read something wrong? |
This task depends upon
Closed by Sven-Hendrik Haase (Svenstaro)
Saturday, 18 February 2012, 23:16 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Saturday, 18 February 2012, 23:16 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) -
Saturday, 18 February 2012, 22:08 GMT
The compression ratio seems right... My guess is that the old package was built on btrfs which makepkg struggled to get a correct size on.
Comment by Sven-Hendrik Haase (Svenstaro) -
Saturday, 18 February 2012, 23:16 GMT
I investigated and the extracted files in both cases have the exact same size. Allan's guess would seem to be correct.