Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#28347 - [ipvsadm] invalid real server listing on i686

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by andy (gghandsome) - Friday, 10 February 2012, 10:01 GMT
Last edited by Sébastien Luttringer (seblu) - Saturday, 03 March 2012, 17:10 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Upstream Bugs
Status Closed
Assigned To Sébastien Luttringer (seblu)
Architecture i686
Severity Medium
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:
it can't correct operation I add some realserver use:
ipvsadm -A -t 192.168.72.122:80 -s rr
ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.72.122:80 -r 192.168.72.125:80 -g -w 10
ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.72.122:80 -r 192.168.72.126:80 -g -w 10

it only can add the frist server.when I use ipvsadm -ln only can see one realserver.then I download the vesion of 1.25 pack from Official Website it can correct operation.may be ipvsadm-1.26 problem

Additional info:
* package version(s)
ipvsadm-1.26

* config and/or log files etc.


Steps to reproduce:
This task depends upon

Closed by  Sébastien Luttringer (seblu)
Saturday, 03 March 2012, 17:10 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Comment by Sébastien Luttringer (seblu) - Monday, 13 February 2012, 01:24 GMT
did you use i686 package?

Can you test with upstream 1.26 tarball.

From my test, issue is only on i686 with 1.26.
Comment by andy (gghandsome) - Monday, 13 February 2012, 12:56 GMT
Yes i use i686 package.use the last archinux Release.use pacman -S ipvsadm.it download 1.26 version from pacman mirror and install.after install i find this error.
Comment by Sébastien Luttringer (seblu) - Monday, 13 February 2012, 18:59 GMT
this error doesn't occur on x86_64 version. I tested on fedora, same issue on i686 package.

It seems to be an upstream bug.
Comment by andy (gghandsome) - Tuesday, 14 February 2012, 08:29 GMT
Thanks for the information by you！！I'll be try it on X64 server.
Comment by Sébastien Luttringer (seblu) - Friday, 17 February 2012, 18:37 GMT
confirmed as an upstream bug see:

http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-users/2011-08/msg00033.html

will be fixed in -3
Comment by Sébastien Luttringer (seblu) - Wednesday, 22 February 2012, 11:12 GMT
currently waiting end of rebuild of libnl to move to community.

Loading...