Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#28164 - [opera] about page for 11.61 says "11.60"

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by Michael Kapelko (kornerr) - Monday, 30 January 2012, 02:46 GMT
Last edited by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto) - Wednesday, 08 February 2012, 07:24 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages
Status Closed
Assigned To Mateusz Herych (Partition)
Bartłomiej Piotrowski (Barthalion)
Architecture i686
Severity Very Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:

Even though the package name is opera-11.61-1, it ships opera 11.60. I've tried re-issuing 'pacman -S opera', still 11.60 in 11.61-1 package.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto)
Wednesday, 08 February 2012, 07:24 GMT
Reason for closing:  No response
Additional comments about closing:  No response for over a week.
Comment by Karol Błażewicz (karol) - Monday, 30 January 2012, 03:33 GMT
How did you check it?

About Opera
Version information
Version 11.61
Build 1250
Platform Linux
System i686, 3.2.2-1-ARCH


[karol@black ~]$ opera --version
Opera 11.61 Build 1250 for Linux i386.
Comment by Michael Kapelko (kornerr) - Monday, 30 January 2012, 05:32 GMT
Yes, I get the same result. But the 'About' page of Opera says: 11.60 beta, and it always prompts a question to update to 11.61.
May be it's Opera guys who screwed up.
Comment by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto) - Monday, 30 January 2012, 07:05 GMT
Unable to reproduce on x86_64.
Comment by Michael Kapelko (kornerr) - Monday, 30 January 2012, 07:55 GMT
I said nothing about x86_64. It's 11.61 on x86_64.
Comment by Michael Kapelko (kornerr) - Monday, 30 January 2012, 07:56 GMT
the request initially contained "opera i686", not just opera.
Comment by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto) - Monday, 30 January 2012, 09:33 GMT
Michael, I know, just wanted to include the fact. Some time people only select "i686" or "x86_64" because that's the platform they have tested it on, and they don't know if it will work or not on other platforms.
Comment by Bartłomiej Piotrowski (Barthalion) - Monday, 30 January 2012, 14:35 GMT
My friend on i686 is also unable to reproduce it. Screenshot here → http://i.imgur.com/c0kPR.png
Comment by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto) - Monday, 30 January 2012, 15:16 GMT
Unable to reproduce on i686 as well.

What's the md5sum for your /usr/lib/opera/opera executable? Here, it's:
d23c39f96c6ee9eb9f939c97d0b061c1

Try removing and then installing the opera package.
Comment by Michael Kapelko (kornerr) - Tuesday, 31 January 2012, 02:28 GMT
yes, the executable has the same MD5 sum. strange...
Comment by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto) - Tuesday, 31 January 2012, 10:10 GMT
Did you try completely removing opera, searching your packages and paths for anything named opera, then installing it again?

Loading...