Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#27797 - [lxdm] deadlock after starting lxdm with tmpfs mounted in /run
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Tomas Mudrunka (harvie) - Monday, 02 January 2012, 00:51 GMT
Last edited by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Saturday, 14 January 2012, 19:48 GMT
Opened by Tomas Mudrunka (harvie) - Monday, 02 January 2012, 00:51 GMT
Last edited by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Saturday, 14 January 2012, 19:48 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
LXDM get unescapeably stucked when launching it on tmpfs mounted in /run Maybe it's just unable to create /run/lxdm/ directory or something, i guess some initscript update can fix it... But i don't know... Steps to reproduce: 1.) fstab: tmpfs /run tmpfs defaults 0 0 2.) reboot 3.) rc.d start lxdm |
This task depends upon
Closed by Dave Reisner (falconindy)
Saturday, 14 January 2012, 19:48 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Saturday, 14 January 2012, 19:48 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Comment by Tomas Mudrunka (harvie) -
Monday, 02 January 2012, 14:57 GMT
it's strange... i've completely deleted contents of /run on hardrive and it worked without problem, but with tmpfs it's still problem...
Comment by Dave Reisner (falconindy) -
Saturday, 14 January 2012, 02:18 GMT
You should not have /run in your /etc/fstab. This partition is managed by initscripts, not the user.
Comment by Tomas Mudrunka (harvie) -
Saturday, 14 January 2012, 19:46 GMT
falconindy: sounds bit strange and overengineered. anyway... tmpfs is already mounted there now, i believe it wasn't when i've tried...
Comment by Dave Reisner (falconindy) -
Saturday, 14 January 2012, 19:48 GMT
No, it sounds like this is a system managed partition, much like /sys, /dev, /dev/shm, and /proc.