Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#27621 - [jre7-openjdk]Should gtk2 be a dependency ?
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Andy Kriger (kokaku) - Monday, 19 December 2011, 01:25 GMT
Last edited by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Friday, 13 January 2012, 15:40 GMT
Opened by Andy Kriger (kokaku) - Monday, 19 December 2011, 01:25 GMT
Last edited by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Friday, 13 January 2012, 15:40 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Because of commit 029ad76fb4d5117811d1ae5f7c7c5615586aecae on Dec 16th, jre7-openjdk now requires gtk2 and libcups. This pulls in many additional packages related to graphics (as many as 35, though that may include packages that would have been upgraded even without the changes to depends) which are unnecessary in a server environment. I don't know a lot about how pacman packaging works, but is it possible to arrange the packaging in such a way that a server install does not require unneeded desktop graphics packages (like gtk2)? |
This task depends upon
Closed by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR)
Friday, 13 January 2012, 15:40 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: pkg has been split into headless and addtional desktop pkg
Friday, 13 January 2012, 15:40 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: pkg has been split into headless and addtional desktop pkg
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/27499
Basically, I am wondering if there is a way to address both concerns without requiring many additional packages.