Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#27475 - [cinelerra-cv] depends on libmjpegutils-1.9

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by Jamie Kitson (JamieKitson) - Tuesday, 06 December 2011, 19:11 GMT
Last edited by Ray Rashif (schivmeister) - Thursday, 08 December 2011, 14:19 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages
Status Closed
Assigned To Ray Rashif (schivmeister)
Architecture All
Severity Medium
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 1
Private No

Details

Description:

cinelerra fails with:

cinelerra: error while loading shared libraries: libmjpegutils-1.9.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

The file /usr/lib/libmjpegutils-1.9.so.0 does not exist, it seems to have been replaced with /usr/lib/libmjpegutils-2.0.so.0. Linking seems to solve the issue:

ln -s /usr/lib/libmjpegutils-2.0.so.0 /usr/lib/libmjpegutils-1.9.so.0

Additional info:
* package version(s)

community/cinelerra-cv 1:2.2-1 [installed]

extra/mjpegtools 2.0.0-1 [installed]
This task depends upon

Closed by  Ray Rashif (schivmeister)
Thursday, 08 December 2011, 14:19 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Comment by Ray Rashif (schivmeister) - Wednesday, 07 December 2011, 15:14 GMT
Thanks, mjpegtools was updated and cinelerra-cv wasn't rebuilt (the rebuild list probably did not catch this).

However, please remember to remove your symlink as that is a nasty workaround, which if remains to be a habit will lead to breakages and headaches in the long run.
Comment by Jamie Kitson (JamieKitson) - Thursday, 08 December 2011, 10:12 GMT
I just wanted to get cinelerra working.

Couldn't you specify a version of mjpegtools in depends?
Comment by Ray Rashif (schivmeister) - Thursday, 08 December 2011, 14:19 GMT
Yes, that's OK as long as you know the consequences. The necessary adjustments have been made to the package.

Loading...