Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#27140 - [rfc] md5sums are wrong
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) - Sunday, 20 November 2011, 12:56 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Monday, 21 November 2011, 09:45 GMT
Opened by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) - Sunday, 20 November 2011, 12:56 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Monday, 21 November 2011, 09:45 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
==> Validating source files with md5sums... rfc-index.txt ... FAILED license ... Passed RFCs0001-0500.tar.gz ... FAILED RFCs0501-1000.tar.gz ... FAILED RFCs1001-1500.tar.gz ... FAILED RFCs1501-2000.tar.gz ... FAILED RFCs2001-2500.tar.gz ... FAILED RFCs2501-3000.tar.gz ... FAILED RFCs3001-3500.tar.gz ... FAILED RFCs3501-4000.tar.gz ... FAILED RFCs4001-4500.tar.gz ... FAILED RFCs4501-5000.tar.gz ... FAILED RFCs5001-5500.tar.gz ... FAILED RFCs5501-6000.tar.gz ... FAILED RFCs6001-latest.tar.gz ... FAILED Additional info: * rfc 20101222-1 Steps to reproduce: Try to build it. |
This task depends upon