Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#26998 - [gnome-packagekit] doesn't build

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) - Friday, 18 November 2011, 10:12 GMT
Last edited by Jonathan Conder (PirateJonno) - Thursday, 16 February 2012, 01:28 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages
Status Closed
Assigned To Jonathan Conder (PirateJonno)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:
Making all in packagekit
/bin/sh: python: command not found
make[3]: *** [genums.py] Error 127
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2

Additional info:
* gnome-packagekit 3.2.1-1

Steps to reproduce:
Try to build it.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Jonathan Conder (PirateJonno)
Thursday, 16 February 2012, 01:28 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Comment by Jonathan Conder (PirateJonno) - Friday, 18 November 2011, 15:08 GMT
Looks like I missed this because my chroots have python installed. I think I'll just make packagekit and gnome-packagekit depend on python 3. Once I've had some sleep that is
Comment by Jonathan Conder (PirateJonno) - Sunday, 20 November 2011, 11:14 GMT
I'll have to wait until pacman 4 (thus packagekit 0.6.19-2) comes out, otherwise I risk messing up the pkgrels for people using [testing]. However I could probably do gnome-packagekit individually if anyone needs this urgently.
Comment by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) - Sunday, 20 November 2011, 11:15 GMT
This is a build issue, then I guess you can fix this in repos/community-i686 and community-x86_64, without bumping pkgrel.
Comment by Jonathan Conder (PirateJonno) - Sunday, 20 November 2011, 11:40 GMT
Ok, good point. I take it this is done via svn directly rather than using communitypkg and db-update?
Comment by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) - Sunday, 20 November 2011, 11:41 GMT
Yes, you can use svn directly.

Loading...