Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#26681 - [mc] u7z in midnight commander
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Valeriy Koval (vkoval) - Saturday, 29 October 2011, 18:41 GMT
Last edited by Jakob Gruber (schuay) - Sunday, 30 October 2011, 12:12 GMT
Opened by Valeriy Koval (vkoval) - Saturday, 29 October 2011, 18:41 GMT
Last edited by Jakob Gruber (schuay) - Sunday, 30 October 2011, 12:12 GMT
|
DetailsDescription: previously both packages provided the file: /usr/share/mc/extfs/u7z (note: these were different) and the file was excluded from the mc. It was a mistake.
Now the mc package should contain the correct version because guys from p7zip don't support that file at all and the file from p7zip package produces wrong output for mc when user tries to open 7z archive. Also I checked the u7z file from the mc sources and it works good. Additional info: mc-4.8.0-1 p7zip 9.20.1-5 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Jakob Gruber (schuay)
Sunday, 30 October 2011, 12:12 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: p7zip-9.20.1-6
mc-4.8.0-2
Sunday, 30 October 2011, 12:12 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: p7zip-9.20.1-6
mc-4.8.0-2
Opening .7z files works just fine for me for what it's worth.
Just to be safe, could you try deleting ~/.mc and ~/.config/mc and trying to open the file again?
Secondly - when I'm opening the .7z archive (the subdirs are inside) with u7z from p7zip I get next (see attach1.png).
But when I'm doing the same with the u7z from the mc site (the link https://www.midnight-commander.org/browser/src/vfs/extfs/helpers/u7z) I get next (see attach2.png)
The difference is:
- in the first case I see some timestamps instead of dirs;
- in the second case - correct info.
P.S. It's regular .7z archive without any special files/dirs with specific chars in their names.
Any thoughts?
Not at all.
I'll push a p7zip package without that file in [testing], and you can push a new mc in [community-testing]; then I can move them both at the same time to [extra] and [community].
Can we be sure this file juggling between 2 packages won't cause 'file already exists in filesystem' errors on upgrade?